[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[6bone] Re: reverse 6dns painful (was Re: reverse DNS consideredpointless)
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 07:46:58AM +0000, Peter Bunclark wrote:
> > I disagree with with any popular DNS providing this feature as it
> > promotes non-standard "standards" (think: Microsoft's active directory
> > service)
> I agree with Chuck, and we were kind of getting there with the bitstring
> proposed standard (but that is ugly, to say the least). Wouldn't it make
> reverse tables just so much easier to view, debug, and yes, create by
> hand, if you could do something like
> +3ffe:1:2:3::4 PTR home.6bone.net
This is exactly the *problem* about the bitstring standard.
To achieve the net result ("human readable IPv6 addresses in the reverse
zone") you don't need to mess up the whole DNS *protocol* - this is a
pure front-end issue. Run your DNS zones through a perl mangler before
feeding to BIND, and no need to change anything at protocol level.
And this is exactly what Jeroen has been saying: non-BIND-solutions
already have these preprocessing capabilities.
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 58081 (57882)
SpaceNet AG Mail: [email protected]
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299