[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[6bone] pTLA request by Euro6IX project for exchange experimentation - review closes 3 Sep 2002
- Subject: [6bone] pTLA request by Euro6IX project for exchange experimentation - review closes 3 Sep 2002
- From: [email protected] (Michel Py)
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:48:57 -0700
Bob /Jordi / 6boner,
In the light of Jordi's reply, I am favorable to the request. However, I
am not sure I read Bob correctly.
> Bob Fink wrote:
> I would also appreciate discussion of any considerations
> that we should be aware of as a 6bone test project.
Bob, do you consider Euro6IX to be a "special" pTLA?
The point I am trying to make here is related to the Teredo request and
the points that Thomas and myself brought back then. I was wondering if
Euro6IX should be placed in the same situation.
My line of thinking is that "special" requests need to have a "special"
consequence on 6bone routing, which certainly applies to Teredo and geo
However, in Euro6IX' case, I don't see what granting them a pTLA changes
for my view of the routing table.
Reading Joao's post that just came in, I think that it might be a good
time to clarify/change the definition of pTLA and write the definition
of "special purpose" 6bone block. Please keep this in mind when
finishing the RIR proposal.