[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Hijacking of prefixes - IPv4 class E (was: Announcing 2003::/16 during tests of "shipworm")
- Subject: Hijacking of prefixes - IPv4 class E (was: Announcing 2003::/16 during tests of "shipworm")
- From: [email protected] (Michel Py)
- Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2001 20:20:11 -0800
From: Jan Oravec [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Something like that would be nice for experiments, but advertising
>> such prefixes has no effect, because the prefix can be already used
>> by someone else for another experiment.
There is a finite number of people that need to advertise a /16 on the
IPv6 DFZ at the same time for the sole purpose of experimenting a new
>> That implies that such experiments cannot be global experiments.
>> The only one way is to make some authority for time limited
>> prefix delegations
Absolutely, and there needs to be no authority for that.
>> <- ugly solution.
>> Anyway, does anyone need to do global experiments ?
This is not even debatable. Not everyone needs global experiments, but
some people do. In the case that prompted all that turmoil
(shipworm/microsoft), there is no doubt that whoever develops such a
protocol will one day or another need to advertise a /16.
Hijacking is bad, but regulated hijacking could have some use,
especially if it does not break anything.