[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Announcing 2003::/16 during tests of "shipworm"
Something like this can become very useful for people trapped behind
firewalls that cannot yet do IPv6, and will be useful until IPv6 is
ubiquitous enough to garner enough support for all companies to support
IPv6 in production hardware.
Also, I heard there are a few cablemodem providers that block non tcp/udp
protocols to prevent use of IPSEC by telecommuters and it breaks IPv6 over
IPv4. Shall these people just be isolated until their providers can get
their act together?
I could see this being useful to me. Hopefully the standard that is
published is the standard that Microsoft sticks to when implementing this
in a release of their OS, so it can be implemented by other platforms.
My god, I'm not only thanking Microsoft, I'm sticking up for them too. What
is this world coming to?
At 09:03 PM 12/6/2001, you wrote:
>Anyway, I don't see the point of using the Shipworm. The cleaner solution
>is to configure IPv6 on the box, which provide NAT for the private network.