[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: Re: Looking for a contact person at Stealth. (fwd)



--fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Ville's request ...


Kurt


--fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7
Content-Type: message/rfc822

Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from pop.pi.be
	by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.0.8)
	for [email protected] (single-drop); Tue, 21 Aug 2001 19:48:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from millennium.stealth.net ([email protected] [206.252.192.5])
	by newbrussel.planetinternet.be (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f7LDtMa18872
	for <[email protected]>; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:55:22 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: by millennium.stealth.net (Postfix, from userid 65697)
	id 4EF9C6AA5; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:55:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by millennium.stealth.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432BCB997
	for <[email protected]>; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:55:19 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:55:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: Ville <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Looking for a contact person at Stealth. (fwd)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-UIDL: 5O_!!c,*#!E&7"!<6S!!


Kurt,

Could you pass this to the list? The message was sent a few
days back but never seemed to reach the list.

Thanks.
 

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 16:20:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: Ville <[email protected]>
To: Amit Schnitzer <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Looking for a contact person at Stealth.


On Sun, 19 Aug 2001, Amit Schnitzer wrote:

> Does anybody know of a contact person at Stealth ?
> I have been in contact with a person named Shrihari Pandit
> [...]
> I also tried to contact him trough the company's address at [email protected]

Amit,

oops. :)

we apologize for the delayed  response - it's unfortunate seeing
you had to seek for alternative contact-method  to  get in touch
with us.  We are mostly pretty easy to find about,  but at times
our schedules are admittedly tied with issues regarding directly
connected customers and other local end-sites.

[email protected] is fine as a contact-address. Basically, it has
has the best reach and always gets to the right people. Personal
e-mail addresses have  the problem of being subject to vacations
and other person-related  issues, as in  the case of any changes
in job-description, et cetera.

PS -  I just spoke  with Shri and he said he'd  get back  to you
within the next few hours' time.



>                    Amit Schnitzer 

Hope this helps,
-- 
	Ville <[email protected]>	Network Security/IPv6 Solutions
					Stealth Communications, Inc.




--fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7--