[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Mar 4, 8:23am, [email protected] wrote:
> Subject: suspect routing?
> What is the general take on mapped IPv4 address prefixes being
> propogated within 6bone, e.g. ::192.0.2.10
> And I've found a recent "feature" that allows the propogation
> of the loopback address ::1
My opinion is that:
- IPv4 compatible routes should not be advertized
- Static routes should be injected in RIPng
only if they are for directly attached links or tunnels
- No default route nor 5f00::/8 routes shld ever be advertized
- more generaly, no routes with a prefixlength < 32 should
ever be advertized.