[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
more tunnels and what to do next
- Subject: more tunnels and what to do next
- From: [email protected] (Kazuhiko Yamamoto 山本和彦)
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 20:12:44 +0900
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 21 Jul 96 20:00:35 -0400"
- References: <[email protected]>
From: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: more tunnels and what to do next
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 96 20:00:35 -0400
> So if someone wants to send sipper.pa-x.dec.com an IPv6 packet they must
> go through Europe as opposed to the UNH-BAY-DEC point? If so that is
> not a good idea???
The WIDE 6bone had been connected to Cisco and NRL before we set up a
tunnel to UNI-C. Ask rja to set up an end point for you.
As I said time to time, we have already drawn a 6bone map with our
best knowledge. Access to "http://www.wide.ad.jp/wg/ipv6/6bone.ps".
It seems to me that no one controls the entire policy. No routing
technology is introduced. I'm very afraid that the 6bone would break
Actually we WIDE project can't manage all routing information even for
the WIDE 6bone so we start rejecting requests from some organizations
I suggest that we should discuss routing protocols as soon as